Right of reply and correction letter
When an article gets facts about you wrong, asking for a correction or a right of reply in the same outlet is often faster than removal and leaves a public record of the truth.
The rules differ by country
In the UK, regulated publishers follow the Editors' Code, which requires significant inaccuracies to be corrected promptly and a fair opportunity to reply when reasonably called for. Germany, France and Turkey grant a statutory right of reply with short deadlines.
Template
To: [Editor / readers' editor], [publication]
Subject: Correction and reply request: "[headline]", [date], [URL]
The article states that "[quoted statement]". This is inaccurate: [correct facts, briefly, with evidence attached].
I ask you to:
1. correct the article and add a clear correction note; and
2. publish the following reply with similar prominence:
"[Your reply, factual and proportionate, without new allegations.]"
[Full name]
[Full name] [Contact details] [Date]Notes
Stay factual and proportionate. If the publisher does not respond, complain to its regulator, apply to Google, or take legal advice.
General information, not legal advice. In real cases we work alongside lawyers who specialise in digital rights.
Frequently asked questions
Can I ask for removal at the same time?
Yes. See our [news article removal request](/en/templates/news-article-removal-request/).